We've been tangoed
August 13, 2019

Blain's Morning Porridge

"I'm going down to Yasgur's farm, gonna join me a rock and roll band.…"

Global Credibility Under Pressure – We've been Tangoed!

This morning's headlines are screaming how Argentina and President Mauricio Macri have precipitated yet another crisis on the stressed geopolitical battlefront. Relax. We are more than used to dealing with Argentina defaults… But, it's far more complex than that.

The latest Argentina danse macabre is all about global credibility. It's another massive fail!

What does it say about the credibility of global institutions and policy when Argentina's whole market collapsed following a primary for an election in December? Outgoing International Monetary Fund President, and soon to be head of the European Central Bank, Christine Lagarde, personally staked her support for President Mauricio Macri's pro-market government when she steamrollered through the IMF's biggest ever bailout of US$56 billion for Argentina last year.

It now looks an extremely poor call on Lagarde's part. Macri won a mere 32 percent of the vote, while former president Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner won 47 percent. Don't Cry for Me Argentina indeed. Domestic Argentine politics have left the IMF looking stupid.

There are three major issues to consider here.

First there is the absolute predictability of what's just happened in Argentina. In return for the 2018 bailout, the IMF demanded its usual pound of flesh policies: austerity, austerity and austerity, spiced with inflation-targeted monetary policy, fiscal tightening, currency controls, and the keys to the peso printing presses.

Give Lagarde some credit – she did pay lip service to the people with a smattering of minor austerity mitigants in terms of gender equality and social provision. But, essentially, the IMF's answer to yet another predictable Argentinian crisis was more of the same programme. You know the definition of madness…

The programme did achieve some minor success: bringing down Argentina's primary deficit and putting the trade balance in to surplus – but only because they spent IMF money supporting the peso.

"Surprisingly" austerity wasn't to the electorate's taste – inflation remains out of control and poverty is rising allowing politicians to exploit the widening income gap divide. What a complete shock! Who could have possibly predicted an unhappy electorate would damn Macri at the polls and favour former Peronistas from the last century instead? (US Readers – Massive Sarcasm Alert.)

While the new Macri government was welcomed by markets in 2015 – it was immediately clear it didn't have widespread and deep-rooted political support. His government was perceived as a tool of global investment banks, global money and the supranationals.

The electorate went along with it for a while, but the results of "neo-liberalizing" the economy were disastrous; killing jobs, creating a balance of payments crisis, devaluation, driving inflation, and yet another flirtation with default – hence the new IMF bailout.

Macri failed to deliver on his promises to the electorate: inflation wasn't reined in, but soared to 60-70 percent. Instead of growth the economy tumbled into recession. And more and more people fell into extreme poverty. Compare and contrast with the experience of Argentina under the populist Peronistas, the Kirchners, who drove recovery in the early 2000s via easy monetary and massive fiscal spending initiatives.

These didn't work so well when commodities declined, recession struck the currency sagged and massive monetary corruption followed. Argentina came close to default in 2012, and a naval vessel was actually seized by one creditor!

The Macri programme effectively went to the dogs yesterday. The laughable Argie century bond crashed as low as 60 yesterday. Default swaps are 40 cents upfront (pay $40 million to insure $100 million). Short-term debt is yielding near 40 percent. Argentinians voted for former leftist politician Kirchner instead, despite the widespread accusations of corruption, and the likelihood her election will simply deepen an ongoing crisis.

The second point to this ongoing Argentine crisis is what does it say about Lagarde? She is a gifted politician, a former French finance minister and apparently very efficient. She is not a trained central banker, but give her credit for being self-aware. She recently admitted: "The Argentine economic situation has proved incredibly complicated and I dare say that many of those involved, including us, underestimated a bit, when we started with the Argentine authorities building the programme."

Her new job at the ECB is going to be a political minefield. She will need to draw Europe into agreement on fiscal policy support for southern European economies – which is a massive political issue when she's seen as Macron's candidate, Merkel is about to exit the stage, and the next crop of German leaders look crushingly incompetent in the leadership department.

The Italian League has already thrown down its gauntlet – if they don't get permission to start spending their way out of recession, they are going to do it anyway.

Lagarde has to balance the economic conservatism of Europe's strongest economy, Germany, against the risks of "free-spending" other Europeans creating further debt crisis. And she has to do it while holding the euro together, dealing with the consequences of Brexit, and being a distinct number two on the priority list for national governments. Is she up to it?

If Lagarde thinks Argentina's economic situation is complex, wait till she tries to balance the ECB. Her job is not to simply continue the "do-what-ever-it-takes" Mario Draghi "keep-the-euro going" mantras, but to actually move the European economy forward in a political vacuum.

The answer is not austerity, austerity, austerity – but that's most likely the only weapon in the ECB's armoury. There are clear parallels between Argentina and Europe – much to be learnt in how not to handle recovery in the face of populism and undeliverable political promises.

The third point to learn from the new Argentina crisis is who leads the IMF now that Lagarde is off to Frankfurt?

The Europeans have decided they want their compromise candidate, Kristalina Georgieva, to lead the institution. It's always been led by a European. The rest of the world don't like that. While I'm sure Georgieva of the World Bank is an excellent candidate…I am sure there are better. Mark Carney – Canadian and Irish. Why not? He's a proper banker…

What a complete mess.

Back to proper Morning Porridge tomorrow.. Out of time..

Bill Blain

Shard Capital





This site, like many others, uses small files called cookies to customize your experience. Cookies appear to be blocked on this browser. Please consider allowing cookies so that you can enjoy more content across fundservices.net.

How do I enable cookies in my browser?

Internet Explorer
1. Click the Tools button (or press ALT and T on the keyboard), and then click Internet Options.
2. Click the Privacy tab
3. Move the slider away from 'Block all cookies' to a setting you're comfortable with.

Firefox
1. At the top of the Firefox window, click on the Tools menu and select Options...
2. Select the Privacy panel.
3. Set Firefox will: to Use custom settings for history.
4. Make sure Accept cookies from sites is selected.

Safari Browser
1. Click Safari icon in Menu Bar
2. Click Preferences (gear icon)
3. Click Security icon
4. Accept cookies: select Radio button "only from sites I visit"

Chrome
1. Click the menu icon to the right of the address bar (looks like 3 lines)
2. Click Settings
3. Click the "Show advanced settings" tab at the bottom
4. Click the "Content settings..." button in the Privacy section
5. At the top under Cookies make sure it is set to "Allow local data to be set (recommended)"

Opera
1. Click the red O button in the upper left hand corner
2. Select Settings -> Preferences
3. Select the Advanced Tab
4. Select Cookies in the list on the left side
5. Set it to "Accept cookies" or "Accept cookies only from the sites I visit"
6. Click OK

Blain's Morning Porridge

"I'm going down to Yasgur's farm, gonna join me a rock and roll band.…"

Global Credibility Under Pressure – We've been Tangoed!

This morning's headlines are screaming how Argentina and President Mauricio Macri have precipitated yet another crisis on the stressed geopolitical battlefront. Relax. We are more than used to dealing with Argentina defaults… But, it's far more complex than that.

The latest Argentina danse macabre is all about global credibility. It's another massive fail!

What does it say about the credibility of global institutions and policy when Argentina's whole market collapsed following a primary for an election in December? Outgoing International Monetary Fund President, and soon to be head of the European Central Bank, Christine Lagarde, personally staked her support for President Mauricio Macri's pro-market government when she steamrollered through the IMF's biggest ever bailout of US$56 billion for Argentina last year.

It now looks an extremely poor call on Lagarde's part. Macri won a mere 32 percent of the vote, while former president Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner won 47 percent. Don't Cry for Me Argentina indeed. Domestic Argentine politics have left the IMF looking stupid.

There are three major issues to consider here.

First there is the absolute predictability of what's just happened in Argentina. In return for the 2018 bailout, the IMF demanded its usual pound of flesh policies: austerity, austerity and austerity, spiced with inflation-targeted monetary policy, fiscal tightening, currency controls, and the keys to the peso printing presses.

Give Lagarde some credit – she did pay lip service to the people with a smattering of minor austerity mitigants in terms of gender equality and social provision. But, essentially, the IMF's answer to yet another predictable Argentinian crisis was more of the same programme. You know the definition of madness…

The programme did achieve some minor success: bringing down Argentina's primary deficit and putting the trade balance in to surplus – but only because they spent IMF money supporting the peso.

"Surprisingly" austerity wasn't to the electorate's taste – inflation remains out of control and poverty is rising allowing politicians to exploit the widening income gap divide. What a complete shock! Who could have possibly predicted an unhappy electorate would damn Macri at the polls and favour former Peronistas from the last century instead? (US Readers – Massive Sarcasm Alert.)

While the new Macri government was welcomed by markets in 2015 – it was immediately clear it didn't have widespread and deep-rooted political support. His government was perceived as a tool of global investment banks, global money and the supranationals.

The electorate went along with it for a while, but the results of "neo-liberalizing" the economy were disastrous; killing jobs, creating a balance of payments crisis, devaluation, driving inflation, and yet another flirtation with default – hence the new IMF bailout.

Macri failed to deliver on his promises to the electorate: inflation wasn't reined in, but soared to 60-70 percent. Instead of growth the economy tumbled into recession. And more and more people fell into extreme poverty. Compare and contrast with the experience of Argentina under the populist Peronistas, the Kirchners, who drove recovery in the early 2000s via easy monetary and massive fiscal spending initiatives.

These didn't work so well when commodities declined, recession struck the currency sagged and massive monetary corruption followed. Argentina came close to default in 2012, and a naval vessel was actually seized by one creditor!

The Macri programme effectively went to the dogs yesterday. The laughable Argie century bond crashed as low as 60 yesterday. Default swaps are 40 cents upfront (pay $40 million to insure $100 million). Short-term debt is yielding near 40 percent. Argentinians voted for former leftist politician Kirchner instead, despite the widespread accusations of corruption, and the likelihood her election will simply deepen an ongoing crisis.

The second point to this ongoing Argentine crisis is what does it say about Lagarde? She is a gifted politician, a former French finance minister and apparently very efficient. She is not a trained central banker, but give her credit for being self-aware. She recently admitted: "The Argentine economic situation has proved incredibly complicated and I dare say that many of those involved, including us, underestimated a bit, when we started with the Argentine authorities building the programme."

Her new job at the ECB is going to be a political minefield. She will need to draw Europe into agreement on fiscal policy support for southern European economies – which is a massive political issue when she's seen as Macron's candidate, Merkel is about to exit the stage, and the next crop of German leaders look crushingly incompetent in the leadership department.

The Italian League has already thrown down its gauntlet – if they don't get permission to start spending their way out of recession, they are going to do it anyway.

Lagarde has to balance the economic conservatism of Europe's strongest economy, Germany, against the risks of "free-spending" other Europeans creating further debt crisis. And she has to do it while holding the euro together, dealing with the consequences of Brexit, and being a distinct number two on the priority list for national governments. Is she up to it?

If Lagarde thinks Argentina's economic situation is complex, wait till she tries to balance the ECB. Her job is not to simply continue the "do-what-ever-it-takes" Mario Draghi "keep-the-euro going" mantras, but to actually move the European economy forward in a political vacuum.

The answer is not austerity, austerity, austerity – but that's most likely the only weapon in the ECB's armoury. There are clear parallels between Argentina and Europe – much to be learnt in how not to handle recovery in the face of populism and undeliverable political promises.

The third point to learn from the new Argentina crisis is who leads the IMF now that Lagarde is off to Frankfurt?

The Europeans have decided they want their compromise candidate, Kristalina Georgieva, to lead the institution. It's always been led by a European. The rest of the world don't like that. While I'm sure Georgieva of the World Bank is an excellent candidate…I am sure there are better. Mark Carney – Canadian and Irish. Why not? He's a proper banker…

What a complete mess.

Back to proper Morning Porridge tomorrow.. Out of time..

Bill Blain

Shard Capital



Free subscription - selected news and optional newsletter
Premium subscription
  • All latest news
  • Latest special reports
  • Your choice of newsletter timing and topics
Full-access magazine subscription
  • 7-year archive of news
  • All past special reports
  • Newsletter with your choice of timing and topics
  • Access to more content across the site

More on:  Market commentary